This U.S. Federal gambling law prohibits the operation of interstate betting activities in the United States. The Federal Wire Act, also known as the Interstate Wire Act of 1961, specifically made it illegal for illicitly run US-based sports gambling businesses to utilize any form of wire communications to send or accept betting information and wagers from across state lines or foreign US-owned territories.
The Federal Council and Parliament recommend accepting the Gambling Act, which updates Swiss gambling laws for the digital age and improves protection against gambling addiction. It implements the will of the Swiss voters, namely that only approved and certified games should be available in Switzerland and that gambling revenue should be used. In addition to the Wire Act, there are several other federal laws that may be invoked against online gambling, but all of them are dependent on the gambling in question being already illegal. So these laws address not gambling, but illegal gambling, for instance the UIGEA's prohibiting financial transactions related to illegal gambling.
The Federal Wire Act officially amended Chapter 50 of Title 18 of the United States Code of Laws. The law has since been interpreted by the DOJ to include interstate online communications; hence its effective prohibition of interstate online sports betting in the US. For this reason, it is important that players and operators understand the specific laws concerning gambling implemented in countries they choose to participate and practice gaming-related activities in.
History of the Federal Wire Act
Then-US attorney general Robert F. Kennedy, who was emboldened by the presence of his brother John F. Kennedy as the US president, suggested to Congress passing a law which would prohibit interstate gambling. His suggestion led to a newly crafted bill which was introduced in the US Senate as SB 1656. This bill would be later known as the Federal Wire Act. SB 1656 was included in eight bills presented to Congress that year. The Federal Wire Act as proposed by Robert F. Kennedy would help the US Justice Department effectively slow down the sportsbook activities of criminal organizations operating within the United States and its territories. The Wire Act was signed on September 13th, 1961 by then-US President John F. Kennedy.
What is the Federal Wire Act?
The Federal Wire Act is a law that was designed to curb the illegal bookmaking activities of organized crime syndicates. Live poker tournaments uk 2020. Its language included and punished domestic businesses and bookies who accepted bets over the telephone or telegraph. This Act was created to specifically address the ongoing and growing issue of organized interstate racketeering and number-fixing which demonstrated to be profitable to criminal organizations and Mafia families. The Federal Wire Act proved to be successful as it severely damaged the 1960's era mobsters from generating revenue from illegal bookmaking activities. The Act's language minimized the mobs reach within the nation and cut their connection from U.S. territories.
What Does the Federal Wire Act Regulate?
The Federal Wire Act regulates the use of wire communication networks by domestic state-based sports betting operations. The Act effectively bans any US-based sportsbooks using wired communications to communicate between states as an attempt to destroy illegal crime networks that profit from game-fixing, racketeering, and wager collecting. While this effectively worked in the 1960's, the Act was not prepared for the invention of the internet nor capable of foreseeing online gaming markets. A law later on known as PASPA would come to regulate domestic brick and mortar sports betting operations and activities for 25 years before its removal from the U.S. lawbooks.
Does The Federal Wire Act Effectively Prohibit Sports Betting In The US?
The Act gave local state law enforcement more strength to apply stricter punishment to mobsters by imposing longer sentences than previously possible under existing state legislation. The Federal Wire Act cut the flow of wealth provided through illegal bookmaking and number fixing to criminal organizations without effecting casual bettors. The Act was not designed to attack players from the U.S.A. but rather to strike unlicensed gambling services that used wired communicates to collect bets and pay out winnings from and to domestic players, respectively. Therefore, the Federal Wire Act was actually an anti-organized crime law not anti-gambling legislation, as while the law is relevant to gambling it also has nothing to do with gamblers.
It is stated in the Federal Wire Act, those caught in violation 'shall be fined or imprisoned for no more than 2 years or both'. This improved the Justice Department's ability to combat the unlicensed illegal sports betting industry which was at the time run by the Mafia and smaller local bookies. The laws enacted by the U.S. Congress and President Kennedy were known as the 1960's Interstate Anticrime Acts which empowered the Federal Government to take a more effective role in the fight against organized crime and racketeering. At the time, the Mafia manipulated Labor Unions, shook down businesses, and ran unlicensed gambling rings.
The Act's language was intended to assist territories and states in enforcing their respective laws on illegal bookmaking. However, as time came to show, the language in the Federal Wire Act could be circumvented by illegal figures through its exclusion of the internet as a wired communication facility. For this reason, in 2001 the Department of Justice under the Bush administration declared the Federal Wire Act of 1961 intended to expand its regulatory prohibition to all forms of US-based online gambling. However, in 2011 the DOJ officially clarified its position that the Federal Wire Act only outlawed US-based intrastate online sports betting operations, and had no application regarding state-regulated online casinos, online sportsbooks, poker sites or other online gambling initiatives allowed by state law.
In 2018, after the repeal of PASPA, the issue of the Federal Wire Act's relevancy to online sportsbooks was brought into question. It was clarified that the Federal Wire Act only restricted -USbased interstate wagering on sports. Meaning that the Wire Act makes it illegal for any domestic state-regulated online sportsbook to accept bets outside fo their state. This allows state-approved sportsbook the capability to offer wagering online to any bettor residing in or visiting their state without violating the Federal Wire Act.
FAQ's
DOES THE FEDERAL WIRE ACT AFFECT ONLINE GAMBLING IN THE UNITED STATES?
The Federal Wire Act was once interpreted as federal legislation that could regulate all forms of online gambling, specifically in the 1990's dot-com era. However, this stance was challenged when the DOJ released a formal opinion on their interpretation of the Federal Wire Act. According to the DOJ's 2011 statement, the Federal Wire Act only applied to US-based online sports betting and did not apply to casino or poker online gambling nor extend its jurisdiction beyond the United States and its declared territories.
In 2018 following the repeal of PASPA, the Wire Act was once more considered due to the major changes in the US sports betting market. The Wire Act now only restricts interstate online betting, which means that state-regulated online sportsbooks are not permitted to accept bets across state lines or from sources outside of the United States. This is a stark contrast from the law's previous application which effectively prohibited all US based online sportsbook activity.
DOES THE FEDERAL WIRE ACT MAKE ONLINE SPORTS BETTING ILLEGAL FOR US RESIDENTS?
No. The Federal Wire Act does not criminalize offshore online gambling as it only outlaws interstate wagering through state-regulated online sports betting. For this reason, states are not permitted to accept bets from outside of their state. If an individual state decides to accept out of state wagers, they would immediately face legal actions and injunctions by sports leagues or the federal government for their violation of this law.
DOES THE FEDERAL WIRE ACT APPLY TO OFFSHORE ONLINE SPORTSBOOKS?
Federal Law Online Sports Betting
No, the Wire Act only has prohibitive jurisdiction concerning betting activities between states within the United States and its territories. Outside of the U.S., governing jurisdictions are free to regulate and license online sportsbooks and offer their betting services to whomever they choose.
The US does not have any federal law on the books that outlaws offshore gambling, therefore, US players are free to access offshore betting destinations. However, the states of Washington and Connecticut do have state laws in place to prohibit residents from engaging in any type of online betting including both US based and/or offshore gambling.
ARE THERE PENALTIES FOR US RESIDENTS WHO BET ON SPORTS ONLINE?
Under the Federal Wire Act, it is only a crime to accept bets outside of a state's jurisdiction or operate a sportsbook on US soil that is unregulated and unlicensed. However, nowhere in the law does it place prohibitions on bettors from the U.S.A. wagering on sports at legally licensed online sportsbooks.
ARE THERE ANY LEGISLATIVE PUSHES TO REWRITE THE FEDERAL WIRE ACT?
Before 2011, the DOJ improperly used the Federal Wire Act to prosecute countless individuals and businesses under the general interpretation of the Wire Act. Since the rise of the internet, the anti-gambling leaning members of Congress intended to use the Wire Act to rid the Internet of casino-style gambling.
In 1996, then-US Senator of Arizona Jon Kyl introduced a bill called the Crime Prevention Act that included an amendment to the Wire Act to encompass the Internet under its prohibitive jurisdiction.
In 1996, then-US Representative Tim Johnson of South Dakota introduced his own bill to take a jab at online gambling called the Computer Gambling Prevention Act.
Federal Law Against Online Gambling
In 1997, Senator Jon Kyl tried once more to introduce another anti-internet gaming legislation by the name of the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act which would make all contests, sports games, or games of chance classified as a bet or wager thus illegalizing its online forms.
In 1999, after his previous attempt in 1997, Senator Jon Kyl tried to reintroduce the same legislation.
In 2002, then-US Representative Bob Goodlatte of Virginia introduced his own prohibitive bill called the Combating Illegal Gambling Reform and Modernization Act which would classify bets and wagers to include all gambling activities and games of chance.
All of these attempts to pass anti-internet gambling legislation failed and due to the DOJ's clarification regarding the application of the Federal Wire Act, few states and government entities were able to prosecute legitimate online businesses and social bettors.
However, in the past few years a new bill has gained momentum and is aimed to outlaw most forms of online gaming. In 2014, Sheldon Adelson the world's wealthiest casino owner who has a great distaste for regulated online gambling is the primary supporter and push behind this bill.
RAWA also known as the Restoration of America's Wire Act which would ban domestically regulated online gambling and immediately criminalize and shut down multiple state-regulated online gaming industries across the US. RAWA could effectively ban online lottery sales, online poker, online sportsbooks, online casinos and online bingo, exemptions include online horse race wagering and daily fantasy sports contests.
Gaming and gambling in the United States have undergone a great boom in recent years. During the past decade, most states have expanded legalized gaming, including regulated casino-style games, sports betting, and lotteries. There has also been an explosion in opening Native American casinos, and the popularity of online gambling in the US has increased exponentially.
Decades ago, gambling used to be illegal almost in every part of the continental US, except for Nevada and New Jersey. However, as time flew by, more and more states have made various types of gambling legal, ranging from Indian casinos, bingo and poker rooms, off-track horse race betting, and more. While some states have approved certain types of gambling, other types have remained 'illegal', so to speak, like online gambling. Almost all states have laws that ban at least some form of gambling.
Understanding US gambling laws is not only important for those involved in the industry, but also for average gamblers who want to know whether he or she can start a fantasy football league, a home poker game, or an NCAA tournament betting pool at the workplace.
In 1999, after his previous attempt in 1997, Senator Jon Kyl tried to reintroduce the same legislation.
In 2002, then-US Representative Bob Goodlatte of Virginia introduced his own prohibitive bill called the Combating Illegal Gambling Reform and Modernization Act which would classify bets and wagers to include all gambling activities and games of chance.
All of these attempts to pass anti-internet gambling legislation failed and due to the DOJ's clarification regarding the application of the Federal Wire Act, few states and government entities were able to prosecute legitimate online businesses and social bettors.
However, in the past few years a new bill has gained momentum and is aimed to outlaw most forms of online gaming. In 2014, Sheldon Adelson the world's wealthiest casino owner who has a great distaste for regulated online gambling is the primary supporter and push behind this bill.
RAWA also known as the Restoration of America's Wire Act which would ban domestically regulated online gambling and immediately criminalize and shut down multiple state-regulated online gaming industries across the US. RAWA could effectively ban online lottery sales, online poker, online sportsbooks, online casinos and online bingo, exemptions include online horse race wagering and daily fantasy sports contests.
Gaming and gambling in the United States have undergone a great boom in recent years. During the past decade, most states have expanded legalized gaming, including regulated casino-style games, sports betting, and lotteries. There has also been an explosion in opening Native American casinos, and the popularity of online gambling in the US has increased exponentially.
Decades ago, gambling used to be illegal almost in every part of the continental US, except for Nevada and New Jersey. However, as time flew by, more and more states have made various types of gambling legal, ranging from Indian casinos, bingo and poker rooms, off-track horse race betting, and more. While some states have approved certain types of gambling, other types have remained 'illegal', so to speak, like online gambling. Almost all states have laws that ban at least some form of gambling.
Understanding US gambling laws is not only important for those involved in the industry, but also for average gamblers who want to know whether he or she can start a fantasy football league, a home poker game, or an NCAA tournament betting pool at the workplace.
As of this writing, a lot of things have changed in the US gambling laws. What was once considered illegal on a federal level is now being made legal by the individual US States, provided that casino operators, and in some cases online gambling operators, apply for the necessary permits and licenses within the jurisdiction in which they wish to operate. If gambling was only allowed in Vegas and Atlantic City before, now states like Colorado, West Virginia, Indiana, Iowa, and Pennsylvania are also coming around, with more and more US states following suit.
Federal Gambling Laws
Below you'll find links to various U.S. Federal Gambling Laws.
- Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. This law applies to online gambling operators accepting financial instruments to fund accounts for players. including online casinos.
- Wire Act of 1961 (See also: Wire Act Violation: Internet v. Phone)
Additional Federal Statutes
Transportation of Gambling Devices Act of 1951.
In 1951, Congress enacted the Transportation of Gambling Devices Act. [236] The Act, more commonly known as the Johnson Act, [237] which has been amended several times during the intervening years, makes it unlawful to knowingly transport a gambling device to a state where such a device is prohibited by law. [238] The manufacturers and distributors of gaming devices for interstate commerce must register each year with the United States Department of Justice, and the devices must be appropriately marked for shipment. [239]
(a) The term 'gambling device' means–
(1) any so-called 'slot machine' or any other machine or mechanical device an essential part of which is a drum or reel with insignia thereon, and
(A) which when operated may deliver, as the result of the application of an element of chance, any money or property, or
(B) by the operation of which a person may become entitled to receive, as the result of the application of an element of chance, any money or property; or
(2) any other machine or mechanical device (including, but not limited to, roulette wheels and similar devices) designed and manufactured primarily for use in connection with gambling, and
(A) which when operated may deliver, as the result of the application of an element of chance, any money or property, or
(B) by the operation of which a person may become entitled to receive, as the result of the application of an element of chance, any money or property; or
(3) any subassembly or essential part intended to be used in connection with any such machine or mechanical device, but which is not attached to any such machine or mechanical device as a constituent part. [240]
The interstate shipment of hardware or software for use in connection with an Internet or Interactive gaming system may trigger the Johnson Act, as well as the Interstate Transportation of Wagering Paraphernalia Act discussed above. [241]
Bank Records and Foreign Transaction Act of 1970.
In 1970, Congress passed the Bank Records and Foreign Transaction Act, [242] which is better known as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). [243] The BSA required 'financial institutions' to report all currency transactions greater than $10,000 in effort to fight money laundering. This obligation was first limited to just banks. In 1985, the United States Treasury Department extended the requirement to casinos through the adoption of regulations. [244] Nevada casinos enjoy an exemption from the CTR reporting requirements of the BSA. [245]
Internet or interactive casinos will certainly be subject to some form of currency reporting requirement whether it is the BSA or Nevada Gaming Commission Regulation 6A, or both.
Money Laundering Control Act of 1986.
In 1986, Congress enacted the Money Laundering Control Act, [246] codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956, 1957. Section 1956 applies to the knowing and intentional laundering of monetary instruments. [247] Section 1957 pertains to monetary transactions involving property that is 'derived from specified unlawful activity,' which includes 'racketeering activity' under RICO. [248]
Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986.
In 1986, Congress enacted the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), [249] codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. The legislation amended Title 18 of the United States Code to extend the prohibition against the unauthorized interception of communications from wire and oral communications to 'electronic communications,' which are defined as:
'electronic communication' means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photooptical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce, but does not include–
(A) any wire or oral communication;
(B) any communication made through a tone only paging device;
(C) any communication from a tracking device (as defined in section 3117 of this title); or
(D) electronic funds transfer information stored by a financial institution in a communications system used for the electronic storage and transfer of funds. [250]
The term 'intercept' means 'the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.' [251]
ECPA provides exceptions for the law enforcement to intercept communications where either (1) law enforcement is a party to the communication, or (2) where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception. [252] The Nevada Gaming Control Board and Nevada Gaming Commission could take advantage of this exemption and be excluded from the reach of ECPA either through the promulgation of a regulatory provision (i.e., that licensees will permit the Board and Commission to monitor all electronic communications with patrons) or by imposing conditions on the licenses o f operators of Interactive gaming.
References
Federal
- Code of Federal Regulations: Title 25, Chapter 3: National Indian Gaming Commission, Department of the Interior
- Proposed Internet Gambling Prohibition Act of 1997 (not passed)
Federal Judicial Decisions
- AT&T Corporation v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe, 295 F.3d 899 (9th Cir. 2002)
Other References
- Joel Michael Schwarz, The Internet Gambling Fallacy Craps Out, 14 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1021 (1999).
- '14 Charged in Internet Betting' (Washington Post, March 5, 1998)
- General Accounting Office's Overview of Internet Gambling Issues
Federal Law And Online Gambling
Related Posts:
